|
|
U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba[read online for free] by David Ruppe, ABC News, May 1, 2001.
Excerpt: In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders
reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism
in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba.
“Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included
the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of
Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and
even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.
Excerpt: The plans had the written approval of all of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy's defense secretary,
Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they apparently were rejected by the
civilian leadership and have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years.
Excerpt: The whole point of a democracy is to have leaders
responding to the public will, and here this is the complete reverse, the
military trying to trick the American people into a war that they want but
that nobody else wants.
Excerpt: The Joint Chiefs even proposed using the potential death
of astronaut John Glenn during the first attempt to put an American into orbit
as a false pretext for war with Cuba, the documents show.
“Should the rocket explode and kill Glenn, they wrote, the
objective is to provide irrevocable proof … that the fault lies with
the Communists et all Cuba [sic].
Excerpt: …the U.S. plan called for establishing prolonged
military — not democratic — control over the island nation after
the invasion.
Excerpt: …President Kennedy told Lemnitzer directly there
was virtually no possibility of ever using overt force to take Cuba, Bamford
reports. Within months, Lemnitzer would be denied another term as chairman and
transferred to another job.
“The secret plans came at a time when there was distrust in the
military leadership about their civilian leadership, with leaders in the
Kennedy administration viewed as too liberal, insufficiently experienced and
soft on communism.
Excerpt: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee published its own
report on right-wing extremism in the military, warning a
considerable
danger
in the education and propaganda activities of military
personnel
had been uncovered.
Excerpt: Even after Lemnitzer was gone, he writes, the Joint
Chiefs continued to plan
pretext
operations at least through 1963.
Excerpt: One idea was to create a war between Cuba and another
Latin American country so that the United States could intervene. Another was
to pay someone in the Castro government to attack U.S. forces at the
Guantanamo naval base — an act, which Bamford notes, would have amounted
to treason. And another was to fly low level U-2 flights over Cuba, with the
intention of having one shot down as a pretext for a war.
Excerpt: Afraid of a congressional investigation, Lemnitzer had
ordered all Joint Chiefs documents related to the Bay of Pigs destroyed, says
Bamford. But somehow, these remained.
Note: Some additional declassified documents from the National Archives on Operation Northwoods can be found here:
9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon[read online for free] by Dan Eggen, Washington Post, August 2, 2006.
Excerpt: Staff members and some commissioners thought that
e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that
military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to
Congress and to the commission…
Excerpt: We to this day don’t know why NORAD [the North
American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us,
said Thomas H.
Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. It
was just so far from the truth. … It’s one of those loose ends
that never got tied.
Excerpt: For more than two years after the attacks, officials
with NORAD and the FAA provided inaccurate information about the response to
the hijackings in testimony and media appearances. Authorities suggested that
U.S. air defenses had reacted quickly, that jets had been scrambled in
response to the last two hijackings and that fighters were prepared to shoot
down United Airlines Flight 93 if it threatened Washington.
“In fact, the commission reported a year later, audiotapes from
NORAD's Northeast headquarters and other evidence showed clearly that the
military never had any of the hijacked airliners in its sights and at one
point chased a phantom aircraft -- American Airlines Flight 11 -- long after
it had crashed into the World Trade Center.
Excerpt: These and other discrepancies did not become clear until
the commission, forced to use subpoenas, obtained audiotapes from the FAA and
NORAD, officials said.
Excerpt: I was shocked at how different the truth was from the
way it was described,
John Farmer, a former New Jersey attorney general
who led the staff inquiry into events on Sept. 11, said in a recent interview.
The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us
and the public for two years. … This is not spin. This is not
true.
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe[read online for free] by Niels H. Harrit et al., Bentham Open, February 13, 2009.
Excerpt: This paper discusses four separate dust samples
collected on or shortly after 9/11/2001. Each sample was found to contain
red/gray chips.
Excerpt: That thermitic reactions from the red/gray chips have
indeed occurred in the DSC (rising temperature method of ignition) is
confirmed by the combined observation of 1) highly energetic reactions
occurring at approximately 430 °C, 2) iron-rich sphere formation so that
the product must have been sufficiently hot to be molten (over 1400 °C for
iron and iron oxide), 3) spheres, spheroids and nonspheroidal residues in
which the iron content exceeds the oxygen content. Significant elemental iron
is now present as expected from the thermitic reduction-oxidation reaction of
aluminum and iron oxide.
Excerpt: Ordinary thermite ignites at a much higher temperature
(about 900 °C or above) and gives a significantly broader trace than
super-thermite [21].
Excerpts: A report on an April 2001 conference discloses who was
known to be working on such explosives at that time:
The 221st National Meeting of the American Chemical Society held during April 2001 in San Diego featured a symposium on Defense Applications of Nanomaterials. One of the 4 sessions was titled nanoenergetics… This session provided a good representation of the breadth of work ongoing in this field, which is roughly 10 years old.… At this point in time, all of the military services and some DOE and academic laboratories have active R&D programs aimed at exploiting the unique properties of nanomaterials that have potential to be used in energetic formulations for advanced explosives… nanoenergetics hold promise as useful ingredients for the thermobaric (TBX) and TBX-like weapons, particularly due to their high degree of tailorability with regards to energy release and impulse management[20].The sol-gel process is very amenable to dip-, spin-, and spray-coating technologies to coat surfaces. We have utilized this property to dipcoat various substrates to make sol-gel Fe2O3/Al/Viton coatings. The energetic coating dries to give a nice adherent film.
Excerpt: The carbon content of the red material indicates that an
organic substance is present. This would be expected for super-thermite
formulations in order to produce high gas pressures upon ignition and thus
make them explosive. The nature of the organic material in these chips merits
further exploration. We note that it is likely also an energetic material, in
that the total energy release sometimes observed in DSC tests exceeds the
theoretical maximum energy of the classic thermite reaction.
Excerpt: …we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray
chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic
material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic
or explosive material.
Exclusive: The Informant Who Lived with the Hijackers[read online for free] by Michael Isikoff, Newsweek, September 16, 2002.
Excerpt: NEWSWEEK has learned that one of the [FBI] bureau's
informants had a close relationship with two of the [9-11] hijackers: he was
their roommate.
Excerpt: The two hijackers, Khalid Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi,
were hardly unknown to the intelligence community. The CIA was first alerted
to them in January 2000, when the two Saudi nationals showed up at a Qaeda
summit
in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Excerpt: Upon leaving Malaysia, Almihdhar and Alhazmi went to San
Diego, where they took flight-school lessons. In September 2000, the two moved
into the home of a Muslim man who had befriended them at the local Islamic
Center. The landlord regularly prayed with them and even helped one open a
bank account. He was also, sources tell NEWSWEEK, a
tested
undercover
asset
who had been working closely with the FBI office in San Diego on
terrorism cases related to Hamas.
NSA:[read/watch online for free] by Democracy Now, January 10, 2008.No Attack Happenedin Gulf of Tonkin
Excerpt: Newly declassified documents have provided more evidence
the Johnson administration faked the Gulf of Tonkin incident to escalate the
Vietnam War. The alleged 1964 attack on U.S. warships by North Vietnamese was
used as a pretext to increase bombing and troop deployments in Vietnam. But a
report from the National Security Agency concludes
no attack happened that
night.